What is 3MT®?
3MT® is an academic competition that challenges doctoral and master's students to describe their research within three minutes to a general audience. 3MT® celebrates the discoveries made by research students and encourages communication about the importance of their research to the broader community.
3MT® Details
The next 3MT® at Wichita State University will be held on November 7, 2025, in the Rhatigan Student Center. Students will be divided into preliminary heats. Heat winners will move on to the final round of judging later that afternoon.
Any graduate student enrolled in master's, PhD, or doctoral programs may compete. A student's program of study must contain an original research project. The degree program need not normally require a thesis or dissertation, however the presentation topic must cover an original research project. You must be enrolled during the fall semester to participate in the competition! Fall graduates are eligible to participate, but please note that the WSU winner is expected to present at a conference the following Spring.
- A single static PowerPoint slide is permitted. No slide transitions, animations or movement of any description are allowed. The slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration.
- No additional electronic media (e.g. sound and video files) are permitted. No additional props (e.g. costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment) are permitted.
- Presentations are limited to three minutes maximum. Competitors exceeding three minutes are disqualified.
- Presentations are to be spoke word (e.g. no poems, raps or songs).
- Presentations are to commence from the stage.
- Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through either movement or speech.
- The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
- Academics (both students and professors) typically present at professional conferences to people who are familiar with their discipline’s jargon and topics. 3MT® is different. In a 3MT® competition, you’re communicating with a general audience. They need to understand the problem and why finding a solution is important.
- Engage your audience: speak to their minds and their feelings.
- A three-minute speech is more difficult than longer speeches; you must be concise. Think hard to determine what your research is about: try to see where it fits in the larger context and as part of the bigger (sometimes global) problem.
- Both your speech and your slide should be carefully crafted. Think of it as a piece of art!
- Each second of your three-minute speech should be planned, revised, revised again, improved upon, and rehearsed. Practice, practice, practice!
- Your speech needs clear structure:
- An introduction—Something catchy that gets your audience’s attention
- The middle part with the details—What are you investigating and what have you found?
- A conclusion—a statement, summary, or story for your audience to remember you by.
- Your slide should be an organic part of your speech. There are endless possibilities! Once again, look at your slice as a piece of conceptual art: an image, symbol, or graphic—that illustrates your point.
Look for winning examples. There are plenty on YouTube and Vimeo:
PRESENTER:
PROGRAM:
FACULTY ADVISOR:
3MT TITLE:
SCORING CALIBRATION:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Does not meet expectations | Demonstrates competency but some major weaknesses | Demonstrates competency but some significant weaknesses | Good, but some flaws | Very good, only very minor flaws | Excellent, almost flawless | Outstanding, no flaws |
Please include a score between 1 and 7 in the 2 sections below.
The competitor will then be provided with an overall score out of 14
|
COMPREHENSION AND CONTENT |
|
|
Presentation provided clear background and significance to the research question |
|
|
Presentation provided clear positionality of the presenter to the research and research approach |
|
|
Presentation clearly described the research strategy/design and the results/findings of the research |
|
|
Presentation clearly described the conclusions, outcomes and impact of the research |
|
|
Score out of 7 |
|
|
ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION |
|
|
The oration was delivered clearly, and the language was appropriate for a non-specialist audience |
|
|
The PowerPoint slide was well-defined and enhanced the presentation |
|
|
The presenter conveyed enthusiasm for their research and captured and maintained the audience’s attention |
|
|
Score out of 7 |
|
| OVERALL SCORE | /14 |
COMMENTS
This very brief comment will be used to provide feedback to unsuccessful entrants via email. Please identify one positive and one area for improvement (the most obvious area). e.g. xxx was good but you need to work on xxx
3MT 2025
First Place: Setareh Darvishi
Department: Doctoral Program in Industrial Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Laila Cure
Title: Dynamic Crew Configuration Recommendations for Emergency Medical Services
Second Place: Anusha Krishna Murthy
Department: Doctoral program in Electrical and Computer Engineering
Advisor: Dr. John Watkins & Dr. Elizabeth Behrman
Title: When Cells Remember: The Quantum Twists Inside Your Brain
Third Place: Laura Santander Diaz
Department: Master’s program in Biological Sciences
Advisor: Dr. Mark Schneegurt
Title: Abundance of Microbial Genes Relevant to N₂O Metabolism in Agricultural Soils Under Different Nitrogen Fertilization Regimes
3MT 2024
First Place: Mary Peterson
Department: Master's in Electrical Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Visvakumar Aravinthan
Title: Equity for Solar Energy Investments
Second Place: Reilly Jensen
Department: Master's in Biomedical Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Kim Cluff
Title: Beyond CT and MRI: Towards Real-Time Brain Hemorrhage Detection with Radio Frequency Resonators
Third Place: Jenna Ercolani
Department: Master's in Industrial Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Laila Cure
Title: Analysis and Modeling of Workload within Emergency Medical Services
3MT 2023
First Place: Jade Driggs
Department: Psychology - Human Factors PhD program
Advisor: Dr. Carryl Baldwin
Title: Judgments of Difficulty While Observing an Automated System Support the Media Equation Hypothesis
Second Place: Sarangan Rajendran
Department: PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering PhD program
Advisor: Visvakumar Aravinthan
Title: Battery Charging Considering Solar-Load Synchrony
Third Place: Anusha Krishna Murthy
Department: Electrical and Computer Engineering PhD program
Advisor: John Watkins
Title: From Chaos to Control: Taming Large-Scale Discrete Systems
3MT 2022
First Place: Sangar Shanthanam
Department: PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Visvakumar Aravinthan
Title: Low Cost Wave Energy Converter
Runner up: Sarangan Rajendran
Department: PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Visvakumar Aravinthan
Title: Valuing Distributed Energy Resources
3MT 2021
First Place: Fariha Tanveer
Department: Master's in Biological Sciences
Advisor: William Hendry
Title: Developing a Human Patient ‘Avatar’ System Particularly Relevant to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).
Runner up: Michael Okwori
Department: PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering
Advisor: Ali Eslami
Title: Application of Machine Learning Models and Feature Engineering to Predict Genomic Phenomena.
3MT 2020
First Place: Morgan Trible
Department: Master's in Biological Sciences
Advisor: Dr. Mary Liz Jameson
Title: Dung Beetles: from Poop to Profits
Runner up: Jonathan Folkerts
Department: PhD in Physics
Advisor: Nickolas Solomey
Title: nuSol: Designing A Solar Neutrino Detector
Runner up :Sai Tarun Prabhu Bandemegala
Department: Master's in Biomedical Engineering
Advisor: Dr. Jaydip Desai
Title: Comprehending Human Cognitive Performance under Varying Simulated Space Conditions.
November 13th, 2026
November 12th, 2027


